How Zapier Counts Tasks
Every action step in a Zap counts as one task. The trigger does not count. So a Zap with 1 trigger + 4 actions = 4 tasks per run.
Example: Lead Capture Zap
- Trigger: New Typeform submission (0 tasks)
- Action: Create contact in HubSpot (1 task)
- Action: Add subscriber to Mailchimp (1 task)
- Action: Send Slack notification (1 task)
- Action: Create row in Google Sheets (1 task)
Total: 4 tasks per form submission
If you get 100 form submissions/month, this Zap uses 400 tasks. On Zapier Professional (750 tasks/mo, $29.99/mo), that is 53% of your monthly allowance from a single automation.
Zapier Plan Limits: What You Actually Get
| Plan | Price | Task Limit | Runs of a 5-step Zap | Cost per Run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100 tasks/mo | N/A (two-step only) | N/A |
| Professional | $29.99/mo | 750 tasks/mo | 150 runs | $0.20/run |
| Team | $103.50/mo | 2,000 tasks/mo | 400 runs | $0.26/run |
The trap: Zapier Free only allows two-step Zaps (1 trigger + 1 action). The moment you need a multi-step Zap, you must upgrade to Professional at $29.99/mo. And your 750 tasks disappear fast with multi-step workflows.
How Make Counts Operations (Differently)
Make also counts each module (step) as one operation. So a 5-module scenario uses 5 operations per run — similar to Zapier. The critical difference is in the volume you get per dollar:
| Plan | Price | Operation Limit | Runs of a 5-step Scenario | Cost per Run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000 ops/mo | 200 runs | $0 |
| Core | $10.59/mo | 10,000 ops/mo | 2,000 runs | $0.005/run |
| Pro | $18.82/mo | 10,000 ops/mo | 2,000 runs | $0.009/run |
| Teams | $34.12/mo | 10,000 ops/mo | 2,000 runs | $0.017/run |
The math: Make Core gives you 10,000 ops for $10.59/mo. Zapier Professional gives you 750 tasks for $29.99/mo. For 5-step workflows, Make delivers 13.3x more runs at 65% less cost.
How n8n Counts Executions (Completely Different)
n8n counts workflow executions, not individual steps. A 5-node workflow that runs once = 1 execution, regardless of how many steps it contains.
Same Lead Capture Flow on n8n
1 trigger + 4 actions = 1 execution (not 4 or 5)
| Plan | Price | Executions | Cost per 5-Step Run |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community (self-hosted) | $0 | Unlimited | $0 |
| Starter (cloud) | $20/mo | 2,500 executions | $0.008/run |
| Pro (cloud) | $50/mo | 10,000 executions | $0.005/run |
The advantage: For complex workflows (5–10+ steps), n8n is dramatically cheaper because step count does not affect the cost. The trade-off is technical complexity — n8n requires more setup than Zapier or Make.
Real-World Cost Comparison: 500 Runs of a 5-Step Workflow
| Platform | Plan Needed | Monthly Cost | Annual Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zapier | Team (2,500 tasks needed, 2,000 included) | $103.50/mo | $828/yr |
| Make | Core (2,500 ops, within 10,000 limit) | $10.59/mo | $108/yr |
| n8n Cloud | Starter (500 executions, within 2,500 limit) | $20/mo | $240/yr |
| n8n Self-Hosted | Community + VPS ($5–10/mo) | ~$7/mo | ~$84/yr |
For 500 runs of a 5-step workflow: Zapier costs $828/yr. Make costs $108/yr. n8n self-hosted costs ~$84/yr. That is a $720/yr difference between Zapier and Make, or $744/yr between Zapier and n8n self-hosted.
How to Reduce Your Zapier Bill
If you are staying on Zapier, here are ways to reduce task consumption:
- Consolidate steps. Use Zapier's built-in Formatter or Code steps to handle multiple transformations in one task instead of chaining individual actions.
- Use Filters early. A Filter that stops a Zap does not count as a task (Zapier does not charge for filtered-out runs). Place filters before expensive multi-step chains.
- Use Paths wisely. Each Path branch counts as a task when executed. Avoid unnecessary paths.
- Move high-volume flows to Make. Keep simple two-step Zaps on Zapier (where it is still convenient) and move complex multi-step flows to Make.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Zapier charge for the trigger step?
Does Make count the trigger module?
When does Zapier still make sense despite higher cost?
Explore Further on Sasanova
Comparisons